دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان

 آمار

تعداد نشریات7
تعداد شماره‌ها102
تعداد مقالات1,140
تعداد مشاهده مقاله1,048,694
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله867,863
Kuhi, Davud, Khoubkar, Sirous. (1393). A Multi-Layered Discourse Analysis of Students’ Classroom Talk in Two Contexts: Rural vs. Urban. , 2(2), 35-49. doi: 10.22049/jalda.2017.13649
Davud Kuhi; Sirous Khoubkar. "A Multi-Layered Discourse Analysis of Students’ Classroom Talk in Two Contexts: Rural vs. Urban". , 2, 2, 1393, 35-49. doi: 10.22049/jalda.2017.13649
Kuhi, Davud, Khoubkar, Sirous. (1393). 'A Multi-Layered Discourse Analysis of Students’ Classroom Talk in Two Contexts: Rural vs. Urban', , 2(2), pp. 35-49. doi: 10.22049/jalda.2017.13649
Kuhi, Davud, Khoubkar, Sirous. A Multi-Layered Discourse Analysis of Students’ Classroom Talk in Two Contexts: Rural vs. Urban. , 1393; 2(2): 35-49. doi: 10.22049/jalda.2017.13649

A Multi-Layered Discourse Analysis of Students’ Classroom Talk in Two Contexts: Rural vs. Urban

Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances
مقاله 3، دوره 2، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 1، آذر 2014، صفحه 35-49    اصل مقاله (616.08 K)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2017.13649
نویسندگان
Davud Kuhi1؛ Sirous Khoubkar* 2
1Assistant professor in TEFL, Islamic Azad University-Maragheh Branch
2Applied linguistics
چکیده
This study aimed at discussing and representing discourse analysis of classroom talk in two contexts. It is significant, since it considers different genres of talk, cultural and social identities, social relations, different ideologies and many other aspects in this analysis. It attempts to analyze the dominant classroom patterns in two contexts. Two cases of study were analyzed in this study: a rural setting which includes 28 participants, and an urban setting including 32 participants. Using Schiffrin’s model of study with different principles – speech act theory, Interactional sociolinguistics, pragmatics, ethnography of communication, conversation analysis, and variation analysis – we tried to interpret and analyze different forms and functions of utterances, different social orders, ideas, thought processes and social identities of participants in each context. Frank talks, simple constructions of utterances, simple action clauses and their referents are common in rural setting, while intertextuality, literal phrases, similes and metaphors, ellipses and complicated action clauses and their referents are popular in urban settings. The findings of this paper direct us toward a complete needs analysis and designing new courses in two contexts. These indicate that there are many differences among two groups.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Discourse؛ Discourse Analysis؛ Multilayered Analysis؛ Rural Context؛ and Urban Context
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 942
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,179


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب