Hybridity of Scientific Discourses: an Intertextual Perspective and Implications for ESP Pedagogy

Barthes, R. (1970). S/Z Paris: Seuil (trans. London: Cape, 1975).

Crismore, A. & Farnsworth, R.  (1989). Mr. Darwin and his readers: exploring interpersonal metadiscourse as a dimension of ethos. Rhetoric Review, 8 (1), 91-112.

Crismore, A. & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: studies in academic discourse (pp. 118-36). Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.

Curtis, R. (1994). Narrative form and normative force: Baconian story-telling in popular science. Social Studies of Science, 24, 419-61.

Duszak, A. (1994). Academic discourse and intellectual style. Journal of Pragmatics, 21 (3), 291-313.

Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating science: the rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 3 (3), 275-96.

Fairclough, N.  (1992a). Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education, 4, 269-293. 

Fairclough, N. (1992b). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis:  The critical study of language. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N.  (2002). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities. In M. Toolan (Ed.), Critical discourse analysis: critical concepts in linguistics, Vol. 2 (pp. 69-103). London and New York: Routledge.

Gergen, K. J.  (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 3, 266-275.

Halliday, M. A. K.  (1993/2004). Writing science: literacy and discursive power. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), The language of science (pp. 119-225). London and New York: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse with reference to Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species. In M. Coulthard (Ed) Advances in written text analysis (pp.. 136-156). London and New York: Routledge.

Hanrahan, M. U. (2010). Highlighting hybridity: a critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. In C. Coffin, T. Lillis and K. O’Halloran (Eds.), Applied linguistics methods: a reader (pp. 148-162). London and New York: Routledge. 

Hatim, B.,& Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the translator. London and New York: Routledge.

Henderson, W. (2001). Exemplification strategy in Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. In M. Hewings (Ed) Academic writing in context (pp. 150-168). The University of Birmingham: University Press.

Hoey, M. (1988). Writing to meet the reader’s needs: text patterning and reading strategies. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics, IV, 15-73. 

Hoey, M. (2000). Persuasive rhetoric in linguistics: a stylistic study of some features of the language of Noam Chomsky. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp. 28-37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hoey. M. (2001). Textual interaction: an introduction to written discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge.

Hunston, S. (1994). Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 191-218). London and New York: Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: an advanced resource book. London and New York: Routledge.

Hyland, K.  (2009). Academic discourse. Continuum. 

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 

Kristeva, J. (1986). The Kristeva reader (Ed. T. Moi). Oxford: Blackwell.

Kuhi, D. (2011). Generic variations and metadiscourse use in the writing of applied linguists: a comparative study and a preliminary framework. Written Communication, 28 (1), 97-141.

Kuhi, D. (2014). Commodified discourses, commodifying discourses: in pursuit of a theoretical model on the constitutive functioning of academic discourse in marketization of higher education. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, 2 (1), 39-62. 

Kuhi, D. &Alinejad, Y. (2015). Stephen Hawking’s community-bound voice: a functional investigation of self-mentions in Stephen Hawking’s scientific discourse. The journal of Applied Linguistics, 8 (17), 82-99. 

Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston (Ed.) and G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp. 142-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Mei, S. W.,& Allison, D.  (2005). Evaluative expressions in analytical arguments: aspects of appraisal in assigned English language essays. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 105-127. 

Miller, C. &Charney, D. (2008). Persuasion, audience and argument.  In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: history, society, school, individual, text (pp. 583-598). London and New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

Myers, G. (1994). Narratives of science and nature in popularizing molecular genetics. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 179-190). London: Routledge.

Nelson, N. (2008). The reading-writing nexus in discourse research. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: history, society, school, individual, text (pp. 435-449). London and New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Richards, S. (1987). Philosophy and sociology of science: An introduction (2^ndedn). Oxford: Blackwell.

Rose, D. (1998). Science discourse and industrial hierarchy. In J. R. Martin and R. Veel (Eds.) Reading science (pp. 236-65). London: Routledge.

Tang, R. & John, S. (1999). The “I” in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 23-39.

Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22 (1), 58-78. 

Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Explorations in applied linguistics 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weisseberg, R &Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research: Experimental research report writing for students of English. Prentice Hall.

Yakhontova, T. (2002). ‘Selling’ or ‘telling’? The issue of cultural variation in research genres. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 216-213). London: Longman.