آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 7 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 102 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,142 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,049,096 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 868,496 |
The Acquisition of French (L3) Orthography by Persian (L1) Speakers Learning English (L2) | ||
| Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 6، شماره 2، آذر 2018، صفحه 29-47 اصل مقاله (212.16 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2019.26354.1091 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Fahimeh Sadat Torabi* 1؛ Ali Akbar Jabbari2 | ||
| 1M.A. in English Education, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor in Applied Linguistics and TESL,Yazd University, Yazd, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Learning the third language is one of the issues that has attracted much attention in recent years. In this research the influence of Persian language as a mother tongue and English as a second language on the correct orthography of French as a third language is studied. This study investigates three hypotheses of transfer, L1 Transfer Hypothesis, L2 Status Factor, and Cumulative Enhancement Model. We examined the role of voice and text in correct orthography of the third language. This study accounts for the acquisition of coda consonant clusters of French by Persian EFL learners. Twenty-two participants of two levels of pre and upper-intermediate of English proficiency and beginner level French proficiency were selected. In this study, first we measured the level of learners' English knowledge by the Oxford Quick Placement Test and then we studied the effectiveness of the first and second languages on the third language learning by the Production test, and the Grammatically Judgment Test. Results of the transfer effect provided a major role for the ‘CEM’. The overall results of the two groups’ performance were not significant which in turn reflected the fact that L2 proficiency had no effect on the acquisition of French orthography. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| L3 Orthography؛ Cumulative Enhancement Model؛ L2 Status Factor Hypothesis؛ L1 Status Factor Hypothesis؛ syllable structure | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Angelovska, T., & Hahn, A. (2012). Written L3 (English): Transfer phenomena of L2 (German) lexical and syntactic properties. In Cross-linguistic influences in multilingual language acquisition (pp. 23-40). Springer, Berlin: Heidelberg.
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23 (4), 459-484.
Bardel, C. (2010). The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition.The state ofthe art. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2-3), 185-219.
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2011). Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor. Second Language Research, 27(1), 59–82.
Chin, D. (2009). Language Transfer in the Acquisition of the Semantic Contrast in L3 Spanish.In Y. K. I. Leung (Ed.), Third Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 24-30). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Clyne, M. (1997). Some of the things trilinguals do. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 1, 95- 116.
Croft, W. (1990).Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dadbakhsh, F., &Jabbari, A. A. (2016). The acquisition of French (L3) coda consonant clusters by English (L2) learner speakers of Persian (L1): An optimality account. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(7), 120.
De Angelis, G., &Selinker, L. (2001).Interlanguage transfer and competing linguistic systems in the multilingual mind.In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen& U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic Influence in third language acquisition (pp. 42-58).Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition (Vol.24).Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
De Angelis, G. (Eds.). (2011). New trends in crosslinguistic influence and multilingualism research. Multilingual matters.
Dewaele, J.M. (1998). Lexical inventions: French interlanguage as L2 versus L3. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 471-490.
Dewaele, J.M. (2001). Activation or inhibition?The interaction of L1, L2 and L3 on the language mode continuum. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen& U. Jessner (Eds.), 113 Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition (pp. 69-89). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Falk, Y. O. (2010). Gingerly studied transfer phenomena in L3 Germanic syntax: The role of the second language in third language acquisition. [Sl: sn].
Falk, Y., &Bardel, C. (2010).The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition.The state of the art. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2-3), 185-219.
Falk, Y., &Bardel, C. (2011). Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor. Second Language Research, 27(1), 59-82.
Flynn, S., Foley, C., &Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults' and children's patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3-16.
Håkansson, G., Pienemann, M., &Sayehli, S. (2002).Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing.Second Language Research, 18(3), 250-273.
Hammarberg, B. (2001). Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production and acquisition.In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen& U.
Hammarberg, B., &Hammarberg, B. (1993).A study of third language acquisition.In The Stockholm-Åbo Conference, 21-22 October 1992 (pp. 60-70).Stockholm University, Department of Linguistics.
Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition (pp. 21-41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Hawkins, R. (1998). The inaccessibility of formal features of functional categories in second language acquisition.Paper presented at PacSLRF’ 98, Tokyo, Japan.
Hawkins, R. (2000). Explaining non-target-like properties of L2 grammars.McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Jedynak, M., &Pytlarz, J. (2011).‘The Issue of Gender in Multiple Language Acquisition’. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference On Third Language Acquisition and Multilingualism, 15-17 September, in Warsaw, Poland.
Jessner, U. (2008). Teaching third languages: Findings, trends and challenges. Language teaching, 41(1), 15-56.
Kur, H. (2009). Adjective placement in L2 and L3 English.International journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(5), 117-136.
Leung, Y. K. I. (2005). L2 vs. L3 initial state: A comparative study of the acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese monolinguals and Cantonese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 8(01), 39-61.
Leung, Y. K. I. (2009). Full transfer vs. partial transfer in L2 and L3 acquisition.In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development.In honor of Lydia White (pp. 157-188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lindqvist, C. (2009). The use of the L 1 and the L2 in L3 French: Examining cross-linguistic lexemes in multilingual learners’ oral production. International journal of multilingualism, 6, 281-297.
Mayo, M. D. P. G. (2012). Cognitive approaches to L3 acquisition. International journal of English studies, 12(1), 129-146.
Montrul, S., Dias, R., & Santos, H. (2010).Clitics and object expression in the L3 acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese: Structural similarity matters for transfer. Second Language Research, 27(1), 21-58.
Murphy, Sh. (2003). Second Language Transfer during Third Language Acquisition. New York, NY, 10034, 1-21.
Ranong, S. N., & Leung, Y. K. I. (2009). Null objects in L1 Thai-L2 English-L3 Chinese: An empiricist take on a theoretical problem. Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar, 162-191.
Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of first language in foreign language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Ringbom, H. (2001). Lexical transfer in L3 production. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 59-68.
Pinto, J. (2013).Cross-linguistic influence at lexical level.A study with Morocco learners of Portuguese as an L3/LN.RevistaNebrija de LingüísticaAplicada 12(número especial), 3-50.
Rothman, J., &CabrelliAmaro, J. (2010). What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state.Second Language Research, 26(2), 189–218.
Selinker, L., &Baumgarten-Cohen, B. (1995).Multiple language acquisition: ‘Damn it, why can’t I keep these two languages apart?’. In M. Bensoussan, I. Kreidler, & E. Aogain (Eds.), Multilingualism and language learning, 8(2).Language, culture and curriculum (pp.115-123).Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Shahmoradi, N. (2013). The Role of Persian (L1) and English (L2) on the Acquisition of French (L3) Syllable Structure. An Unpublished MA Thesis.Yazd Islamic Azad University.
Shanon, B. (1991). Faulty language selection in polyglots. Language and cognitive processes, 6(4), 339-350.
Sikogukira, M. (1993). Influence of languages other than the L1 on a foreign language: A case of transfer from L2 to L3. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 110-132.
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of organizational behavior, 13(3), 265-274.
Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied linguistics, 19(3), 295- 333. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 663 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 321 |
||
