Popularization of Scientific Discourses and Penetration of Informal Elements

Barthes, R. (1970). S/Z, Paris: Seuil.

Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason. On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chang, Y., & Swales, J.  (1999). Informal elements in English academic writing: threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers? In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: texts, processes and practices. London: Longman.

Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R.  (1989). Mr. Darwin and his readers: Exploring interpersonal metadiscourse as a dimension of ethos. Rhetoric Review, 8(1), 91-112.

Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: studies in academic discourse (pp. 118-36). Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.

Curtis, R. (1994). Narrative form and normative force: Baconian story-telling in popular science. Social Studies of Science, 24, 419-461.

Duszak, A. (1994). Academic discourse and intellectual style. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(3),291-313.

Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 3(3), 275-296.

Fairclough, N.  (1992a). Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education, 4, 269-293. 

Fairclough, N. (1992b). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N.  (2002). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities. In M. Toolan (Ed.), Critical discourse analysis: Critical concepts in linguistics, Vol. 2 (pp. 69-103). London and New York: Routledge.

Gergen, K. J.  (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 3, 266-275.

Halliday, M. A. K.  (1993/2004). Writing science: literacy and discursive power. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), The language of science (pp. 119-225). London and New York: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Hanrahan, M. U. (2010). Highlighting hybridity: A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. In C. Coffin, T. Lillis and K. O’Halloran (Eds.), Applied linguistics methods: A reader (pp. 148-162). London and New York: Routledge. 

Harwood, N. (2005a). We do not seem to have a theory … The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 343-375.

Harwood, N.  (2005b). ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted … In this article I aim to do just that’: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1207-1231.

Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the translator. London and New York: Routledge.

Henderson, W. (2001). Exemplification strategy in Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context (pp. 150-168). Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham Press.

Hoey, M. (1988). Writing to meet the reader’s needs: Text patterning and reading strategies. Trondheim Papers in Applied Linguistics, IV, 15-73. 

Hoey, M. (2000). Persuasive rhetoric in linguistics: A stylistic study of some features of the language of Noam Chomsky. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp. 28-37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hoey. M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge.

Hunston, S. (1994). Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 191-218). London and New York: Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London and New York: Routledge.

Hyland, K.  (2009). Academic discourse. Continuum. 

Hyland, K., & Jiang, K. (2017). Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes, 45, 40-51.

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 

Kristeva, J. (1986). The Kristeva reader (Ed. T. Moi). Oxford: Blackwell.

Kuhi, D. (2011). Generic variations and metadiscourse use in the writing of applied linguists: A comparative study and a preliminary framework. Written Communication, 28(1), 97-141.

Kuhi, D. (2014). Commodified discourses, commodifying discourses: In pursuit of a theoretical model on the constitutive functioning of academic discourse in marketization of higher education. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, 2(1), 39-62. 

Kuhi, D., & Alinejad, Y. (2015). Stephen Hawking’s community-bound voice: A functional investigation of self-mentions in Stephen Hawking’s scientific discourse. The journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(17), 82-99. 

Kuhi, D. (2017). Hybridity of Scientific Discourses: An Intertextual Perspective and Implications for ESP Pedagogy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 5(2), 61-80.

Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp. 142-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Mei, S. W., & Allison, D.  (2005). Evaluative expressions in analytical arguments: aspects of appraisal in assigned English language essays. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 105-127. 

Miller, C., & Charney, D. (2008). Persuasion, audience and argument.  In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 583-598). London and New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

Myers, G. (1994). Narratives of science and nature in popularizing molecular genetics. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 179-190). London: Routledge.

Nelson, N. (2008). The reading-writing nexus in discourse research. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 435-449). London and New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

Putnam, L. L.  (2009). Symbolic capital and academic fields: An alternative discourse on journal rankings. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 127-134.

Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78. 

Weissberg, R., & Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research. London: Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited.

Whitely, P. (2000). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48(3), 443-466.

Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Explorations in applied linguistics 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yakhontova, T. (2002). ‘Selling’ or ‘telling’? The issue of cultural variation in research genres. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 216-213). London: Longman.