Analyzing Iran Daily and US Today in Terms of Meta-Discourse Elements

Abdollahzadeh, M. (2009). The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, doi:10. 1016/j.pragma.

Aristotle, (1984)."Rhetoric," The complete 1vrieks of Aristotle. Jonathan Barnes (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bakhtin, A. (1986). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Beaufort, D. (1999). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.

Beaufort, D. (2004). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/OUP.

Berenkotter, C., &Huckin, T. N. (1995).Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition / culture /power. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Bhatia, K. (1993). Developing second language skills: Theory to practice (2nd Ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally College.

Butler, C. S. (1990). Qualifications in science: Modal meanings in scientific texts. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing Scholar: Studies in academic discourse (pp. 137-70). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Candlin, C. N., &Lotfipour-Saedi, K. (1983). Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing. Research in theTeaching of English, 30, 149-181.

Candlin, C. N., Bruton, C., & Leather, M. (1974). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10, 39–71.

Carter, R., &Nunan, D. (2001).Teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Connor, U. (1996).Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Coulthard, E. (1975). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 95-113.

Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.

Crismore, A., Markkanen R., &Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10, 39–71.

Crismore, G., & Farnsworth, K. (1990). Patterns of engagement: Dialogic features and L2 student’s writing. In L. Ravelli& R. Ellis (Eds.), Academic Writing in Context: Social-functional Perspectives on Theory and Practice. London: Continuum.

Dafouz, J. (2003). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.

Dafouz, J. (2008). Discourse markers in the expository writing of Spanish university students. IBERICA, 8, 63-80.

Devitt, V. (1991). Metadiscourse and reading comprehension: The effects of language and proficiency. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 220–239.

Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992).Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

Eggins, S. (2004). Rhetorical consciousness raising in the L2 reading classroom.Journal of Second LanguageWriting, 13(2), 291-319.

Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (Eds.).(1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.

Fuertes-Olivera, P. A., Candlin, C. N., Bruton, C., & Leather, M. (2001).Contrastive functional analysis.Amesterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Garfinkel, W. J. (1967). Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric. In F. Barton & C. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition (pp. 91-113). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Garfinkel, W. J. (1972). Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse.College Composition and
Communication, 36, 82–93.

Greetz, Z. (1973). The effect of metadiscourse awareness on L2 reading comprehension: A case of Iranian EFL learners. Ccsenet: English Language Teaching Journal, 3(1), 92-102.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1964). “Syntax and the consumer.”In C. I. J. M. Stuart (Ed.), Report of the Fifteenth Annual (First International) Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press. 11-24. Reprinted in Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). On Language and Linguistics.Volume 3 of Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday.Edited by J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.

Halliday, M. (2008).Complementarities in Language (1^sted). Beinjin Shi: Commercial Press.

Halliday, M., Mcintash, J., &Strevens, A. F. (1964). Measuring program outcomes: What impacts are important to assess and what impacts are possible to measure? Paper prepared for the Design Conference for the Evaluation of Talent Search. Washington DC: Office of Policy with Planning, U.S. Department of Education.

Hill, M. B. (1958). The economics of human capital and investment in higher education: The nature and role of public policy in the finance of higher education. In M. B. Paulsen & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice (pp. 55-94). New York, NY: Agathon Press.

Hoey, M. (1979). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 189–236.

Hyland, K. (1998a). Impact of Internet images: Impression-formation effects of university web site images. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 12(2), 59–68.

Hyland, K. (1998b). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29.

Hyland, K. (1999). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. New York: Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2004). Language, context and literacy.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2, 113-135.

Intarprawat, F., &Steffensen, L. (1995).Impact of student aid program design, operations, and marketing on the formation of family college-going plans and resulting college-going behaviors of potential students.Boston, MA: The Education Resources Institute (TERI).

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K., (2004). Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 622-642.

Lautamatti, L. (1978). Observation on the development of topic in simplified discourse.In V. Kohonen& N. E. Enkvist.(Eds.), Text linguistics, cognitive learning, and language teaching, (pp. 71-104). Turku, Finland: Afinla. Reprinted in U. Connor & R. B Kaplan. (Eds.). Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text. (pp. 87-113). Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.

Le, E. (2004). Active participation within written argumentation: Metadiscourse and editorialist’s authority. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 687-714.

Medway, M. (1994). The sources of racial-ethnic group differences in college enrollment: A critical examination. New Directions for Institutional Research, 133, 51-66.

Mitchel, L. W. (1957). Studying college access and choice: A proposed model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, p. 99- 157). New York: Agathon Press.

Noorian, M., &Biria, K. (2010).Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.

Orta, M., Vanhala, A., &Aniszewski, M. (2006).Tekstoobrazujuščijmetatekst v russkoj I finskojnaučnojreči.Scando-Slavica.Tomus, 47, 39-52.

Poock, M. C., &Lefond, D. (2003). Characteristics of effective graduate school web sites: Implications for the recruitment of graduate students. College and University, 78(3), 15-19.

Reid, T. B. W. (1956). Linguistics, structuralism and philology.ArchivumLinguisticum, 8(1), 28 37.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1994).Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse.English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170.

Salahshoor, F. and Afsar, P. (2017).An Investigation of Interactional Metadiscourse in Discussion and Conclusion Sections of Social and Natural Science Master Theses.The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, Volume 5, Issue 2, Summer and Autumn, 2017, pp. 7-14

Selinker, L., & Trimble W. J. (1973).Metadiscourse and the recall of modality markers.Visible Language, XXII (2/3), 232-267.

Selinker, L., Todd Trimble, M., & Trimble, L. (1976).Presuppositional rhetorical information in EST discourse.TESOL Quarterly, 10(3), 281–290.

Sinclair, J., &Coulthard, R. M. (1975).Toward an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smith, E. (2001). Implications of multiple intelligence theory for second language learning.Post script, 2(1), 1-21.

Sperber, M. A., & Wilson, K. (1989).An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Steffensen, J. P. (1996). Second culture acquisition: Cognitive considerations. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in SecondLanguage Teaching and Learning (pp. 28-46). Cambridge: CUP.

Swales, J. M. (1981).Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, UK: The Language Studies Unit, University of Aston.

Tadros, A. (1980). Prediction in economics texts. English Language Research Journal,1,42-59.

Tardy, L. (2006). I conclude not: Toward a pragmatic account of metadiscourse. Rhetoric Review, 11(2), 265-289.

Tardy, L. (2009).Teaching language in context. USA: Heinle&Heinle.

Thompson, G. (2001). The sound of one hand clapping: the management of interaction in written
discourse. TEXT, 15(1), 103–127.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse, ethnicity, culture and racism. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Action. London: Sage Publications.

Van Dijk, T. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffner& A. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (17-33).Aldershot: Dartmouth.

Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse.College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82-93.

Vanhala-Aniszwski, E. (2001). What develops in the development of second language writing? Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 225-254.

Varttala, T. (2002).Hedging in scientific research articles: A cross-disciplinary study, linguistic insights.Studies in Language and Communication, 2, 141-174.

Vázquez, I., &Giner, D. (2008). Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in research articles. A cross-disciplinary study.RevistaAlicantina de EstudiosIngleses, 21, 171-190.

Widdowson, H. G. (2004). Text, context, pretext. Critical issues in discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.

William, L. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In J. Baugh and J. Sherzer (Eds.) Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics (28-53). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.