آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 6 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 125 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,585 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,755,040 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,636,612 |
An Investigation of the Relationships and Order of the Recall/Recognition Knowledge of Vocabulary Acquisition Components in an Iranian EFL Context | ||
| Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 13، شماره 2، دی 2025، صفحه 1-29 اصل مقاله (964.32 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2025.30663.1814 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Farahman Farrokhi1؛ Mohammad Zohrabi2؛ Nava Nourdad3؛ Aysan Bolandnazar* 4 | ||
| 1Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 2َAssociate Professor of ELT, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor of ELT, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 4PhD Candidate in ELT, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Vocabulary is a powerful carrier of meaning in a language, and developing vocabulary knowledge is an essential task in the process of enhancing a foreign language. The current study explores vocabulary knowledge as a multi-component construct by analyzing various vocabulary components’ relationships and acquisition order in an Iranian EFL context. Moreover, this study aims to provide a better conceptualization of EFL vocabulary knowledge. A total of 170 Iranian EFL learners were evaluated using eight vocabulary tests that assessed recall and recognition knowledge of derivatives, form-meaning link, multiple meanings, and collocations, following Nation’s (2022) framework. First, correlational analyses indicated that all measured word knowledge components were interrelated. Moreover, the Implicational Scaling analysis uncovered a uniform trend in vocabulary acquisition for these components, suggesting that recognition knowledge is obtained before recalling knowledge across all aspects. Therefore, the hierarchy pattern indicated that the participants with knowledge of higher aspects are highly likely to know the lower aspects. Furthermore, Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated that word knowledge in this context can be conceptualized as a unidimensional construct. A comprehensive understanding of the nature of vocabulary knowledge and the interrelationships among its components can provide critical insights into the role of vocabulary acquisition in EFL contexts. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| vocabulary knowledge components؛ vocabulary recall؛ vocabulary recognition؛ implicational scaling | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2019). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Barclay, S., Schmitt, N. (2019). Current perspectives on vocabulary teaching and learning. In: Gao, X. (Ed.) Second handbook of English language teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_42
Cao, D. & Badger, R. (2023). Cross-linguistic influence on the use of L2 collocations: The case of Vietnamese learners. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(3), 421-446. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev2020-0035
Cheng, J., & Matthews, J. (2018). The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading. Language Testing, 35(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216676851
Chui, A. (2006). A study of the English vocabulary knowledge of university students in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 16, 1–23.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
González-Fernández, B. (2022). Conceptualizing L2 vocabulary knowledge: An empirical examination of the dimensionality of word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(4), 1124-1154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000930
González‐Fernández, B. (2025). How is vocabulary learnt? An acquisitional sequence of L2 word knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 59(2), 755-784. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3342
González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2020). Word knowledge: exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy057
Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9(2), 139-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2086306
Hartshorn, K. J., & Surer, A. (2023). Contributions toward Understanding the Acquisition of Eight Aspects of Vocabulary Knowledge. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 9(2), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.13865
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. SEM, 6(1), 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Janebi Enayat, M., & Amirian, S. M. R. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary size and depth for Iranian EFL learners at different language proficiency levels. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2020.120891
Jeensuk, S., & Suckying, A. (2021). An investigation of high school EFL learners’ knowledge of English collocations. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 8(1), 90-106.
Karafkan, M. A. (2021). The role of breadth, depth of vocabulary knowledge, and related learning strategy preferences in predicting writing performance of Iranian EFL learners [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tabriz. Faculty of Literature and Foreign Languages].
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y. (2020). Structural equation modeling of vocabulary size and depth using conventional and Bayesian methods. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 618. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00618
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, Strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x
Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 36, 611-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu007
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. Victoria University of Wellington.
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2020). The different aspects of vocabulary knowledge. In S. Webb Ed.) The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 15–29). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291586-2
Nation, P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Nguyen, T. M. H., & Webb, S. (2017). Examining second language receptive knowledge of collocation and factors that affect learning. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 298-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816639619
Nontasee, W., & Sukying, A. (2020). The acquisition of vocabulary knowledge in Thai EFL high school students. Journal of Man and Society Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 63-87. https://so06.tcithaijo.org/index.php/husocjournal/article/view/242189
Nontasee, W., & Sukying, A. (2021). The learnability of word knowledge aspects in Thai EFL high school learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 34-55. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.3
Peters, E. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814568131
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationships between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942
Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language (pp. 209–227). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.10.15rea
Saigh, K. (2015). Derivative Knowledge and the Development of an Affix List for Pedagogy [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham].
Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48(2), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00042
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977
Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077
Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001022
Spencer, M., Muse, A., Wagner, R. K., Foorman, B., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Tighe, E. L., & Bishop, M. D. (2015). Examining the underlying dimensions of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge. Reading and Writing, 28(7), 959–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9557-0
Stebbins., R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. SAGE Publications.
Sukying, A. & Nontasee, W. (2022). The acquisition order of vocabulary knowledge aspects in Thai EFL learners. World Journal of English Language, 12(5), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n5p306
Surer, A. (2021). Investigating what it means to know a word: implicational scaling for five aspects of word knowledge [Unpublished Master thesis, Brigham Young University].
Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_3
Wang, T., & Zhang, H. (2025). Reciprocal effects of vocabulary breadth, vocabulary depth, and reading comprehension: a cross-lagged panel analysis in Chinese-speaking EFL learners. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1): 410. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04694-2
Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050023
Zhong, H. F. (2014). The interface between receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: Vocabulary knowledge as a multi-aspect construct [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney]. Retrieved from https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/12472
Zhong, H. F. (2018). The relationship between receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: A perspective from vocabulary use in sentence writing. The Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1127403 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 621 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 232 |
||