آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 6 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 125 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,580 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,733,010 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,611,544 |
Written Text-Based and Audio-Visual Feedback Practices in EFL Writing: Investigating University Students’ Responses, Challenges, and Strategies | ||
| Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 13، شماره 2، دی 2025، صفحه 49-76 اصل مقاله (1.06 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2025.31047.1889 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Supiani Supiani* 1؛ Nur Mukminatien2؛ Suharyadi Suharyadi3؛ Siti Muniroh3؛ Lailatul Kodriyah4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate in English Language Teaching, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia Lecturer, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB Banjarmasin, Indonesia | ||
| 2Professor of ELT, Department of English, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Negeri Malang (UM), Malang, Indonesia | ||
| 3Associate Professor of ELT, Department of English, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Negeri Malang (UM), Malang, Indonesia | ||
| 4Assistant Professor of ELT, Department of English Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB Banjarmasin, Indonesia, ORCID | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Previous studies have examined students’ engagement with various forms of teacher-written feedback, particularly in relation to improving writing performance. However, little attention has been paid to how students respond emotionally, cognitively, and behaviorally to the use of a combination of written text-based and audio-visual feedback in an EFL writing class. To fill this gap, this classroom case study investigates Indonesian undergraduate students’ responses to various types of multimodal feedback, aiming to promote substantive revision and improvement in their writing. This multimodal feedback provides a more comprehensive and engaging approach to guiding and supporting student learning in writing development compared to using written text-based feedback alone. Data were collected through students’ written drafts, instructor feedback, student-instructor conferences, and follow-up interviews with students enrolled in an essay writing course. The findings revealed that while many students initially experienced confusion, frustration, or discouragement, particularly with indirect written corrective feedback, continued instructor support and the use of audio-visual feedback enhanced clarity, engagement, and understanding through its conversational tone and visual cues. Students became more reflective and utilized diverse resources, although they struggled with higher-level revisions due to limited feedback literacy and writing proficiency, or a lack of language proficiency. To overcome challenges, they relied on peer collaboration, instructor guidance, and digital tools. Face-to-face conferences also helped them clarify issues and improve the quality of their drafts. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Audio-visual feedback؛ students’ responses؛ university students؛ written text-based feedback | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Acar Başeğmez, D., Er, K. O., & Kurnaz, A. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of the writing skills curriculum developed for gifted students. The Journal of Educational Research, 118(4), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2484805
Ajjawi, R., Kent, F., Broadbent, J., Tai, J. H. M., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. (2021). Feedback that works: A realist review of feedback interventions for written tasks. Studies in Higher Education, 47(7), 1343–1356. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1894115
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). In M. Holquist (Ed.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp. 259-422). University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. (V. McGee, Trans.). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (pp. 60-102). University of Texas Press.
Bahula, T., & Kay, R. H. (2021). Exploring student perceptions of video-based feedback in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(4), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i4.4224
Biju, L. G., & Vijayakumar, S. (2023). Systematic review on the impact of technology-supported writing environment for developing writing skills. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 23(3), 290-313. https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/60/36
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 learners with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
Boudin, A., Bertrand, R., Rauzy, S., Ochs, M., & Blache, P. (2024). A multimodal model for predicting feedback position and type during conversation. Speech Communication, 159, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2024.103066
Cahyono, B. Y., & Rahayu, T. (2020). EFL students ' motivation in writing, writing proficiency, and gender. TEFLIN Journal, 31(2).163-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v31i2/162-180
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024). Examining Second Language (L2) Learners’ Engagement with AWE-Teacher Integrated Feedback in a Technology-Empowered Context. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00877-8
Campbell, B. S., & Feldmann, A. (2017). The power of multimodal feedback. Journal of Curriculum, Teaching, Learning and Leadership in Education, 2(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.32873/uno.dc.ctlle.02.02.1028
Carless, D. (2007). Conceptualizing pre‐emptive formative assessment. Assessment in Education : Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478412
Din Eak, A., & Annamalai, N. (2024). Enhancing online learning: a systematic literature review exploring the impact of screencast feedback on student learning outcomes. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 19(3), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-08-2023-0100
Ebadi, S., & Dadgar, M. (2024). The effects of multimodal online feedback delivery on the writing skills of EFL learners. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 25(3), 148-171.
Emilia, E., & Hamied, F. A. (2015). Systemic functional linguistic genre pedagogy (SFL GP) in a tertiary EFL writing context in Indonesia. TEFLIN journal, 26(2), 155-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/155-182
Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 81–104), Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007
Fu, Q. K., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2022). A review of AWE feedback: Types, learning outcomes, and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1-2), 179-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2033787
Gan, B., Menkhoff, T., & Smith, R. (2015). Enhancing students’ learning process through interactive digital media: New opportunities for collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 652-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.048
Gozali, I., Wijaya, A. R. T., Lie, A., Cahyono, B. Y., & Suryati, N. (2024). ChatGPT as an Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Tool: Feedback Literacy Development and AWE Tools' Integration Framework. JALT CALL Journal, 20(1), 1-22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1423132.pdf
Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
Grigoryan, A. (2017). Feedback 2.0 in online writing instruction: Combining audio-visual and text-based commentary to enhance student revision and writing competency. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9152-2
Glover, C., & Brown, E. (2006). Written feedback for students: too much, too detailed, or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience education, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.2006.07000004
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019). Interpersonality and teacher-written feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 165–183). Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Hung, S. T. A. (2016). Enhancing feedback provision through multimodal video technology. Computers & Education, 98, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.009
Jiang, L., Lee, I., & Yu, S. (2024). Conceptualizing multimodal feedback literacy for L2 writing teachers in the digital age. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 1479–1496. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12578
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2020a). The effects of written corrective feedback. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(1), 28-52. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.37949
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2020b). The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 519-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818802469
Kim, Y., & Emeliyanova, L. (2019). The effects of written corrective feedback on the accuracy of L2 writing: Comparing collaborative and individual revision behavior. Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 234-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819831406
Khosravi, R., Dastgoshadeh, A., & Jalilzadeh, K. (2023). Writing metacognitive strategy-based instruction through flipped classroom: An investigation of writing performance, anxiety, and self-efficacy. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00264-8
Lam, R. (2015). Understanding EFL students' development of self‐regulated learning in a process‐oriented writing course. TESOL Journal, 6(3), 527-553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.179
Li, W., Chen, X., & Huang, L. (2024). Promoting second language writing through technology-driven multimodal text feedback. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(5), 462-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2315104
Mahoney, P., Macfarlane, S., & Ajjawi, R. (2019). A qualitative synthesis of video feedback in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(2), 157-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1471457
Martin, J. R. (1999). Mentoring semogenesis: “Genre-based” literacy pedagogy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 123–155). Cassell.
Nagao, A. (2019). The SFL genre-based approach to writing in EFL contexts. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 4(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0069-3
Park, J. (2024). Students’ perceptions toward providing video-enhanced multimodal feedback on oral presentations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2344546
Penn, S., & Brown, N. (2022). Is screencast feedback better than text feedback for student learning in higher education? A systematic review. Ubiquitous Learning: an international journal, 15(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v15i02/1-18
Puengpipattrakul, W. (2014). A Process Approach to Writing to Develop Thai EFL Students' Socio-Cognitive Skills. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 11(2), 270-284.
Rassaei, E. (2019). Computer-mediated text-based and audio-based corrective feedback, perceptual style, and L2 development. System, 82, 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.004
Saeed, M. A., & Abdullah Alharbi, M. (2024). Show and talk or show and let’s talk? Enhancing formative assessment and students’ uptake through asynchronous and synchronous screencast technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(3), 925-940. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2359469
Saeed, M. A., AbuSa'aleek, A., & Alharbi, M. A. (2024). Examining teacher’s evaluative language in written, audio, and screencast feedback on EFL learners’ writing from the appraisal framework: A linguistic perspective. Assessing Writing, 61, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100871
Suci, D. N., Basthomi, Y., Mukminatien, N., Santihastuti, A., & Syamdianita, S. (2021). EFL students’ responses on teacher’s online written feedback: Interaction, revision, and perception. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i2.28549
Supiani, S., Rahmawati, N. M., Widyaningsih, T. L., Suryati, N., & Mukminatien, N. (2023a). EFL Students' Language Accuracy Development through Self-Assessment from Online Written Feedback: How Do They Experience and Perceive It? Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 24(2). https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/14
Supiani., Yansyah., Basthomi, Y. (2023b). Indonesian university students' engagement with teacher's written corrective feedback in English as an additional language writing classroom. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2023.121334
Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2006). Approaches to teaching second language writing. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 3, 1-26.
Tyrer, C. (2021). The voice, text, and the visual as semiotic companions: an analysis of the materiality and meaning potential of multimodal screen feedback. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4241-4260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10455-w
Wang, Q., & Newell, G. E. (2025). Teaching and learning argumentative writing as critical thinking in an EFL composition classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 51, 100-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2025.100891
Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500353061
West, J., & Turner, W. (2016). Enhancing the assessment experience: Improving student perceptions, engagement, and understanding using online video feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 400-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.1003954
Widiati, U., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2016). The teaching of EFL writing in the Indonesian context: The state of the art. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(3), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v13i3.40
Widiati, U. (2002). Problems with peer response of the writing-as-a-process approach in an EFL writing classroom. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang, 9(3), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v9i3.491
Widodo, J. (2023). The culture of creating poetry and writing speech texts among Indonesian higher education students. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 186-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.902016
Widodo, H. P. (2006). Designing a genre-based lesson plan for an academic writing course. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(3), 173-199.
Widodo, H. P. (2014). Methodological considerations in interview data transcription. International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 101-107.
Yiğit, M. F., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2021). Effect of video feedback on students’ feedback use in the online learning environment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1966489
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Zhang, L. J., & Cheng, X. (2021). Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54, Article 101043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101043
Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 348 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 228 |
||