آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 5 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 116 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,331 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,335,195 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,267,456 |
An Investigation of Interactional Metadiscourse in Discussion and Conclusion Sections of Social and Natural Science Master Theses | ||
| Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 10، آذر 2017، صفحه 7-14 اصل مقاله (487 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2018.26208.1060 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Farzad Salahshoor1؛ Parya Afsari* 2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| 2MA Student of TEFL, Department of English Language and Literature, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University,Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study is a corpus-based study of interactional metadiscourse in natural and social science master theses. For this purpose, 30 natural and social science master theses in six disciplines were randomly selected out of the library of five universities. Five master theses were selected in each discipline, in a period of six years (2010-2016).This study analyzed only the discussion and conclusion sections of master theses. To investigate interactional metadiscourse, Hyland’s (2005) classification was used. The results of this study demonstrated that the percentile proportion of total interactional metadiscourse markers in social science master theses was more than natural science master theses. Among the analyzed resources, hedges was the most frequent role in both corpora while attitude markers in social science and self-mention in natural science was the least favored role. The results of the present study suggested that being aware of interactional metadiscourse markers can shed light on the way of writing of academic texts because these markers help writers to negotiate with their readers and make the text more comprehensible and coherent. The results of the present study might offer pedagogical implication of this aspect of metadiscourse for postgraduate students. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Interactional markers؛ Master thesis؛ Metadiscourse؛ Natural science؛ Social science | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdi, R. (2002). Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies, 4(2), 139-145.
Aguilar, M. (2008).Metadiscourse in academic speech: A relevance-theoretic approach. Bern: International Academic Publishers.
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., &Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39-71.
Fuertes-Olivera, P. A., Velasco-Sacristan, M., Arribas-Bano, A., &Samiengo-Fernandez, E. (2001). Persuasion and advertising English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1291-1307.
Harris, Z. (1959). The transformational model of language structure.Anthropological Linguistics, 1(1), 27-29.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K., &Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.
Khalili, A., &Aslanabadi, M. (2014).The use of metadiscourse devices by non-native speakers in research articles. The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 2(2), 21-34.
Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Discourse about discourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82–93.
Vande Kopple, W. (2002).Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric. In F. Bar-ton & C. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition (pp. 91–113). Cresskill NJ: Hampton Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,216 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,243 |
||