The impact of gender on using reading sub skills in Iranian EFL learners reading comprehension

Alderson, J. C. (1999). Testing reading comprehension skills (Part Two). Reading in a Foreign Language, 7(1), 465-503.

Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: CUP.

Al-Nujaidi, A. H. (2000). The relationship between vocabulary size, reading strategies, and reading comprehension of EFL learners in Saudi Arabia. PhD thesis, Oklahoma State University.

Anderson, N. (1999). Exploring second language learning: Issues and strategies. Boston, MA: Newbury House.

Brantmeier, C. (2003a). Beyond linguistic knowledge: individual differences in second language reading. Foreign Language Annul, 36(1), 33-43.

Brantmeier, C. (2003b). Does gender make a difference? Passage content and comprehension in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(1), 1-23.

Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2^nd Ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Cameron, D. (2005) Language, gender and sexuality: current issues and new directions.  Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 482–502.

 Darabie, M.Y. (2000). The relationship between college-level Jordan students’ metacognitive awareness strategies and their reading comprehension achievement in English as a foreign language. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio University, USA.

Davis, F. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 499-545.

Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner individual difference in second language acquisition. Second Language Acquisition Research Series. Routledge.

Drasgow, F. (1987). Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 19-29.

Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R.L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73, 1–13.

Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Epstein, C. F. (1988). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Gafni, N. (1991). Differential item functioning: Performance by sex on reading comprehension tests. ERIC Document ED 331844. Rockville, MD: Educational.

Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 3(25), 375-406.

Grabowska, A., Herman, A., & Iwona, K. (1994). Individual differences in the functional asymmetry of the human brain.Acta Neurobiol, 54, 155-162.

Harris A. M, &Carlton, S. T. (1993). Patterns of gender differences on mathematics items on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Appl Meas Educ, 6 , 137–151.

Hirvela, A. (2002). Incorporating Reading into EAP Writing Courses. In J. Flowerdew& M. Peacock (Eds.), Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes (pp. 330-346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huckin T., & Haynes, M. (1993). Summary and future directions. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary acquisition (pp. 289-298). Norwood, NJ: Albex.

Hyde,J. S. (2005). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,104(1), 53 – 69.

Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lawrence, I. M., & Curley, W. E. (1989). Differential item functioning for males and females on SAT-Verbal reading sub score items: Follow-up study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research.

LeLoup, J. W. (1993). The effect of interest level in selected text topics on second language reading comprehension. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University.

Lenneberg, E. (1967).Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.

LoCastro, V. (2001). Individual differences in second language acquisition: Attitudes, learner subjectivity, and L2 pragmatic norms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 69-89.

Machin, S.,& McNally, S. (2005). Gender and student achievement in English schools. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(3), 357-372.

Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: CUP.

Nourzadeh, A. (2005). On the relationship between Iranian EFL learners' gender and their use of reading strategies at high schools. M.A.,WWW.teo.ir/images/part/maghale/27.pdf, Tehran, Iran.

Nuttall, C. (1998). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.

O'Neill, K.A., & McPeek, W. M. (1993). Item and test characteristics that are associated differential item functioning. In P.W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), differential item functioning, Hillsdale(pp. 35-66), NJ: Earlbaum.

Pae, T-I. (2003). Gender differential item functioning on a national language test. PhD thesis, Purdue University.

Tae-II, P. (2004). Gender effect on reading comprehension with Korean EFL learners. Journal of System, 32(2), 265-281.

Rezazadeh, M., &Tavakoli, M. (2009). Investigating the relationship among test anxiety, gender, academic achievement and years of study: A Case of Iranian EFL university students. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 68-74.

Rua, P. (2006). The sex variable in foreign language learning: An integrative approach. University of the Balearic Islands. pp. 99-114.

Seifoori, Z. (2015). Postgraduate English students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and their reading comprehension: A comparative study.  The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 3(1), 117-134.

Scovel, T. (1988). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human language. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Wendler, C. L., & Carlton, S. T. (1997). An examination of SAT verbal items for differential performance by women and men: Exploratory study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Washington D.C.

Zarifi, A., &Asadpour, E. (2017). Exploring Reading Comprehension Needs of Yasouj EAP Students of Persian Literature.  The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances,5(1), 89-98.