دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان

 آمار

تعداد نشریات5
تعداد شماره‌ها111
تعداد مقالات1,247
تعداد مشاهده مقاله1,199,579
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله1,060,297
Eskandari, Shokoufeh, Behnam, Biook, Ramazani, Abolfazl, Monsefi, Roya. (1397). A Linguistic Study on the Translation of Parvin E’tesami’s Poems into English Using Catford’s Category Shifts. , 7(1), 47-65. doi: 10.22049/jalda.2019.26454.1121
Shokoufeh Eskandari; Biook Behnam; Abolfazl Ramazani; Roya Monsefi. "A Linguistic Study on the Translation of Parvin E’tesami’s Poems into English Using Catford’s Category Shifts". , 7, 1, 1397, 47-65. doi: 10.22049/jalda.2019.26454.1121
Eskandari, Shokoufeh, Behnam, Biook, Ramazani, Abolfazl, Monsefi, Roya. (1397). 'A Linguistic Study on the Translation of Parvin E’tesami’s Poems into English Using Catford’s Category Shifts', , 7(1), pp. 47-65. doi: 10.22049/jalda.2019.26454.1121
Eskandari, Shokoufeh, Behnam, Biook, Ramazani, Abolfazl, Monsefi, Roya. A Linguistic Study on the Translation of Parvin E’tesami’s Poems into English Using Catford’s Category Shifts. , 1397; 7(1): 47-65. doi: 10.22049/jalda.2019.26454.1121

A Linguistic Study on the Translation of Parvin E’tesami’s Poems into English Using Catford’s Category Shifts

Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances
مقاله 6، دوره 7، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 13، خرداد 2019، صفحه 47-65    اصل مقاله (569.48 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2019.26454.1121
نویسندگان
Shokoufeh Eskandari1؛ Biook Behnam2؛ Abolfazl Ramazani* 3؛ Roya Monsefi4
1MA in Translation Studies, Department of English Language and Literature, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.
2Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran.
3Assistant Professor of American and British Literature, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.
4Assistant Professor of Translation Studies, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.
چکیده
The present study aimed to investigate the translation into English by Alaeddin Pazargadi of Parvin E’tesami’s poems; in particular, it attempted to analyze the structural elements such as verbs, nouns, pronouns, adjectives, adverbs, articles, conjunctions, prepositions, and interjections in them. Considering the relationship between Linguistics and Translation Studies, the theoretical framework chosen was that by Catford (1965) whose category shifts which are of a linguistic nature concentrate on the text constituents such as clause, phrase, and word. The main objectives of this paper were to determine what kinds of category shifts were mostly utilized by the translator, and, using linguistic-oriented approaches to translation, to shed more light on the source text (ST) structures. To this aim, the qualitative and quantitative methodologies of research were used. The analyses indicated that, amongst the 14 selected couplets, unit shifts had the most frequency while structure shifts were the least frequent category shifts used in the act of translation.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Linguistics؛ Translation Studies؛ Linguistic-Oriented Approaches to Translation؛ Translation Shifts؛ and Structural Elements
مراجع
Amid, H. (2009). Amid Persian dictionary. Tehran: Rah-e-Roshd Publications.

Bell, R. T. (1991). Translation and translating: theory and practice. London and New York: Longman.

Cambridge Dictionaries Online. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british/grammar/so (accessed 5 October 2017).

Catford, J. C. (1965). A Linguistic theory of translation. London: Oxford University Press.

Cyrus, L. (2009). Old concepts, new ideas: approaches to translation shifts. MonTI, 1, 88-106.

Hatim, B., &Munday, J. (2004). Translation: an advanced resource book. London & New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Hodges, P. (2009). Linguistic approach to translation theory. Portal for Language Professionals and Their Clients. Retrieved from: http://www. Translationdictionary.com (accessed 7 December 2017).

House, J. (2011). Translation quality assessment: a model revisited. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.

Kuhiwczak, P., &Littau, K. (2007). A companion to translation studies. Clevedon, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

Leonardi, V. (2000). Equivalence in translation: between myth and reality. TranslationJournal, 4(2), 1-9.

Munday, J. (2001). Introducing translation studies: theories and applications. London and New York: Routledge.

Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. New York and London: Prentice-Hall.

Nida, E. (1964). Towards a Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill.

Nida, E. (1969). Science of translation. Language, 45(3), 483-98.

Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Current English (2005), International Students’ Edition. In S. Wehmeier (Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pazargadi, A. (2002). A collection of ParvinE’tesami’s poems. In A. Bahrami (Ed.), Tehran: Rahnama Publications.

Sapir, E. (1921). Language: an introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

Vinay, J. P., &Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative stylistics of French and English: A methodology for translation (J. C. Sager & M. J. Hamel, Trans.). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Original work published 1958).

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,873
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,300


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب