آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 5 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 108 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,228 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,146,416 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,004,959 |
Realizations and Functional Patterns of Shell Nouns in Applied Linguistics Research Articles | ||
| Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
| مقاله 14، دوره 7، شماره 2، آذر 2019، صفحه 201-211 اصل مقاله (295.54 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2019.26675.1150 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Seyed Foad Ebrahimi* 1؛ Abdollah Mohsenzadeh2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Applied Linguistics, English Department, Shadegan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shadegan, Iran | ||
| 2MA in Applied Linguistics, English Department, Shadegan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shadegan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study intends to investigate the realizations and functional patterns of shell nouns in Applied Linguistics research articles. To this end, fifty research articles in the field of Applied Linguistic were selected from Journal of English for Academic Purposes and journal of English for Specific Purposes published by Elsevier. The articles were analyzed for the realizations of shell nouns based on the list suggested by Hinkel (2004). As to the functional patterns, Schmid’s (2000) classification of functional patterns of shell nouns was also adopted. Findings reported that some shell nouns are used more frequently while some were put aside. Findings also reported that writers of research articles in the field of Applied Linguistics used functional patterns suggested by Schmid (2000). Findings of this study could have implications by raising the awareness of writers of Applied Linguistics research articles, especially in EFL contexts, concerning the use of shell nouns and functional patterns in which shell nouns are used. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Shell Noun؛ Research Article؛ Applied Linguistics؛ Functional Patterns | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aktas, R. N., & Cortes, V. (2008). Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 3-14.
Botley, S. P. (2006). Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(1), 73-112.
Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 17(3), 301-316.
Ebrahimi, S. F. (2014). “This Study Tests.....” Functional Analysis of the Grammatical Subjects in Research Article Abstracts: A Cross Disciplinary Study. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 3(4), 341-349.
Ebrahimi, S. F. (2017). “In order to…….” A functional study of marked theme in method sections from three disciplines. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 4(3), 689-699.
Flowerdew, J. (2003). Signaling nouns in discourse. English for specific purposes, 22(4), 329-346.
Francis, G. (1986). Anaphoric nouns (No. 11). English Language Research, Department of English, University of Birmingham.
Francis, G. (1989). Aspects of nominal-group lexical cohesion. Interface: Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 27-53.
Francis, G. (1994). Labelling discourse: an aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion. In: M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp.83-101). New York: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman Group Limited.
Hinkel, E. (2001). Matters of cohesion in L2 academic texts. Applied language learning, 12(2), 111-132.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Routledge.
Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (1999). Pattern grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ivanič, R. (1991). Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open-and closed-system characteristics. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(2), 93-114.
Kashiha, H., & Chan, S. H. (2014). Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Investigation of Lexical Bundles in Academic Writing. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 22(4), 937-951.
Kolhatkar, V., & Hirst, G. (2014). Resolving shell nouns. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 499-510).
Liu, D. (2008). Linking adverbials: An across-register corpus study and its implications. International journal of corpus linguistics, 13(4), 491-518.
Liu, Q., & Deng, L. (2017). A genre-based study of shell-noun use in the N-be-that construction in popular and professional science articles. English for Specific Purposes, 48, 32-43.
Mousavi, A., & Moini, M. R. (2014). A corpus study of shell nouns in published research articles of education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1282-1289.
Nesi, H., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Lexical bundles and discourse signaling in academic lectures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 283-304.
Schmid, H. (2000). English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Walter de Gruyter.
Tadros, A. (1994). Predictive categories in expository text. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 69-82). New York: Routledge. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 408 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 414 |
||