تعداد نشریات | 5 |
تعداد شمارهها | 111 |
تعداد مقالات | 1,245 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,193,075 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,053,089 |
Literature as History in Twelve Years a Slave and its Movie Adaptation | ||
Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 15، تیر 2020، صفحه 65-75 اصل مقاله (67.03 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2020.26735.1162 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Nasrin Malekpour* 1؛ Maghsoud Esmaili Kordlar2 | ||
1M.A. in English Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran | ||
2Assistant Professor of English Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Marand Branch, Marand, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
This paper tries to examine literature as history, with an emphasis on the crucial role of fiction in narrating the marginalized events of history. Some fictions are actual accounts of events in history, and some are reflection of events. Actually, literature and history are integrated to each other, in a way that, pure history which shows us the reality and truth is just a myth. The pens writing history are subjective, and subject to power. During the history power has been a factor to control many things, among them discourse and history. On the other hand, literature is not independent either, and it reflects the hue and colure of its era and history in more than one way. Notwithstanding the genre, the writers who produce literary texts are living in a determined history, in which some events are dominant. In other words, literary texts were written in a context that definitely affected writers’ mind. Twelve Years a Slave is a clear example of literature as a tantamount to history, since it seeks to express the ignored angles of history in literary language. This article examines the inseparability and complementarity of literature and history in Twelve Years of Slave and its film adaptation. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
History؛ Literature؛ Movie Adaptation؛ Black History؛ Slave Narrative | ||
مراجع | ||
Atwood, M. (2000). The blind Assassin. London: Bloomsbury.
Bautista, C. F. (1988). Literature as History. Philippines Studies, 36(2), 195-202.
Ben Khalifa, T. (2017). Structuring Racist Ideologies in Stephen Crane’s “A Dark Brown Dog”: A Critical Discourse Analysis. The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 5(2), 15-46.
Douglass, F. (1845). Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass. New York: Penguin.
Du Cille, A. (1993). The coupling: Sex, text, and tradition in black women’s fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. London: Verso Books.
Lyotard, J. F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Northup, S. (1853). Twelve years a slave. London: Sampson Low, Son & Co.
Phillips, U. B. (1929). Life and labor in the old South. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Sharfstein, D. (2011). The invisible line: Three American families and the secret journey from Black to White: A secret history of race in America. New York: Penguin.
Walter, J. (1999). Soul by Soul: Life inside Antebellum slave market. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Walvin, J. (1996). Questioning slavery. London: Rutledge.
White, E. G. (2006). The ministry of healing. Vernon C. Spark.
Worley, S. (1997). Solomon Northup and the sly philosophy of the slave pen. Callaloo, 20(1) 243-259.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 515 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 634 |