آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 5 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 108 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,228 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,147,421 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,006,419 |
The Ambrose of Lost in the Funhouse: A Confluence of Quantum Mechanics, Dasein, and Baroque | ||
| Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 10، شماره 1، تیر 2022، صفحه 181-199 اصل مقاله (303.09 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2022.27427.1358 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ali Emamipour* 1؛ Farideh Pourgiv2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate in English Language and Literature, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1759-1471 | ||
| 2Professor of English Literature, Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| It has been quite a while since research in different disciplines has become widely cross-fertilized. The cultural matrix of our era has made it possible for ideas and metaphors to move across disciplines. John Barth has been one of the most-celebrated cross-disciplinary fiction writers, who has been perceptive of and receptive to breakthroughs in other disciplines to reinvigorate fiction. Despite the fact that Barth’s literary career, particularly from Lost in the Funhouse (Funhouse), coincides with the coronation of Quantum Mechanics as the regime capable of addressing reality in a more precise way, the recognition of the influence of Quantum Mechanics on Funhouse has been conspicuously absent from the critical enterprise, and the bulk of research has viewed it in the light of Poststructuralism, whose application to contemporary fiction has been exhaustible by now. Establishing the framework of the Article based on some concepts for which the Copenhagen Interpretation and the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics are famous, the present study offers a new perspective to approach the idiosyncrasies of Ambrose in the series, thereby employing an unprecedented methodology to replenish a work which has been subjected to a barrage of metafictional readings. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| baroque؛ phenomenology؛ quantum mechanics؛ the uncertainty principle؛ wave-particle duality | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Barth, J. S. (1981). Lost in the funhouse: Fiction for print, tape, live voice. Bantam Books.
Baulch, D. M. (2003). Time, narrative, and the multiverse: Post-Newtonian narrative in Borges's the garden of the forking paths and Blake's Vala or the four zoas. The Comparatist, 27, 56-78. www.jstor.org/stable/44367186
Bell, J. S. (1992). Six possible worlds of quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 22(10), 1201-1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889711
Booker, M. K. (1990). Joyce, Planck, Einstein, and Heisenberg: A relativistic quantum mechanical discussion of Ulysses. James Joyce Quarterly, 27(3), 577–586. www.jstor.org/stable/25485062
Coale, S. C. (2011). Quantum flux and narrative flow: Don DeLillo’s entanglements with quantum theory. Papers on Language and Literature, 74(3), 261-294. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1011088122?accountid=45153
Coulthard, A. R. (1994). Barth's lost in the funhouse. The Explicator, 52(3), 180. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/barths-lost-funhouse/docview/216771890/se-2?accountid=45153
Davis, R. C. (1985). The case for a post-structuralist mimesis: John Barth and imitation. The American Journal of Semiotics, 3(3), 49-72. https://search.proquest.com/docview/213746945?accountid=45153
de Broglie, L. (1924). Recherches sur la théorie des quanta. Annales de Physique, 10(3), 22-128.
Dillard, A. (1983). Living by fiction. Harper Colophon.
Doležel, L. (1998). Heterocosmica: Fiction and possible worlds. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Edwards, B. (1985). Deconstructing the artist and the art: Barth and Calvino at play in the funhouse of language. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature, 12(2), 264–86. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/crcl/index.php/crcl/article/view/2649
Fletcher, J. (2019). Myths of the underworld in contemporary culture: The backward gaze. Oxford University Press.
Front, S. (2015). Shapes of time in British twenty-first century quantum fiction. Cambridge Scholars.
Greene, B. (1999). The elegant universe: Superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory. Random House.
Greene, B. (2004). The fabric of the cosmos: Space, time, and the texture of reality. Alfred A. Knopf.
Hauser, A. (1962). The social history of art: Renaissance, mannerism and baroque. Routledge.
Hinden, M. (1973). Lost in the funhouse: Barth’s use of the recent past. Twentieth Century Literature, 19(2), 107–118. www.jstor.org/stable/440892
Johnson, C. D. (2020). On Borges’s B/baroque. Comparative Literature,72(4), 377-405. https://doi.org/10.1215/00104124-8537731
Katsumori, M. (2011). Niels Bohr's complementarity: Its structure, history, and intersections with hermeneutics and deconstruction. Springer.
Kinch, S. S. (2011). Quantum mechanics and modern fiction (Order No. 3037511). [Doctoral dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin, Ann Arbor]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304728312?accountid=45153
Lawrence, D. H. (1995). The spirit of place: Studies in classic American literature. Atlantic Publishers and Distributers.
Martin, W. T. (1997). Self-knowledge and self-conception: The therapy of autobiography in John Barth's Lost in the funhouse. Studies in Short Fiction, 34(2), 151-157. https://search.proquest.com/docview/195690422?accountid=45153
Merrell, F. (2006). Jorge Luis Borges and early quantum labyrinths. In J. Hoeg, & K. S. Larsen (Eds.), Science, literature, and film in the Hispanic world (pp. 49-73). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601963_4
Morrell, D. (1976). John Barth: An introduction. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Nas, L. (1999). “Scheherazade,c’est moi”: Narrativist mimesis and the principle of metaphoric means in John Barth. Journal of Literary Studies, 15(1-2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564719908530221
Plotnitsky, A. (2017). Philosophical skepticism and narrative incredulity: Postmodern theory and postmodern American fiction. In P. Geyh (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to postmodern American fiction (pp. 63-80). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316216514.006
Reilly, C. (2000). An interview with John Barth. Contemporary Literature, 41(4), 589–617. www.jstor.org/stable/1209004
Ryan, M. L. (2006). From parallel universes to possible worlds: Ontological pluralism in physics, narratology, and narrative. Poetics Today, 27(4), 633-674. https://search.proquest.com/docview/204269671?accountid=45153
Shankar, R. (2016). Quantum mechanics: The main experiment. Fundamentals of physics II: Electromagnetism, optics, and quantum mechanics. Yale University Press.
Slaughter, C. N. (1989). Who gets lost in the funhouse. Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, 44(4), 80-97. doi:10.1353/arq.1989.0017 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 446 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 370 |
||