آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 5 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 111 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,247 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,199,571 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,060,291 |
Iranian EFL In-Service Teachers’ Conceptions About Critical Thinking and Its Role in Foreign Language Teaching | ||
| Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 9، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 18، دی 2021، صفحه 59-78 اصل مقاله (617.26 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2021.27228.1303 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Jalil Yazdankhah1؛ Bahram Behin* 2؛ Mohammad Hossein Yousefi3؛ Hassan Asadollahfam3 | ||
| 1PhD Candidate in ELT, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran, Email | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, English Language Department, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Adopting a qualitative design, the present study investigated Iranian EFL teachers’ attitudes toward critical thinking as well as its role in language teaching. To meet these objectives, 36 EFL teachers were selected through purposeful sampling as the participants of the study. For the purpose of the data collection, in-depth interviews, focus group interviews, and teachers’ narratives were utilized. To assure the trustworthiness of the data, several measures have been taken. The lead author conducted the in-depth as well as focus group interviews and elicited teachers’ narratives. The interviews were conducted in Persian language and the whole procedures were audiotaped. The data were transcribed verbatim and after member checking the data with the participants, they were translated into English. The data were analyzed through thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). To assure inter coder reliability, coding the data was done by the second and third authors independently. The third and fourth authors were involved in finding the potential themes and sub-themes. Finally, five themes of efficiency, intelligence, change, success and initiation were generated as a result of the data analysis. The present study revealed that the participants emphasized some fundamental building blocks of critical thinking. The participant teachers also advocated critical thinking - focused programs in teacher education as well as its application in language teaching. The study has a number of implications for language pedagogy, teacher education and policy makers. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| in-service teachers؛ teacher education؛ language teaching؛ teacher development؛ teacher beliefs | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1102– 1134. doi:10.3102/0034654308326084.
Alagozlu, N. (2007). Critical thinking and voice in EFL writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9(3), 118–136.
Alnofaie, H. (2013). A framework for implementing critical thinking as a language pedagogy in EFL preparatory programmes. Thinking Skills and Creativity,10, 154–158. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 100347 9 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198–206.
Cohen, D. J., & Crabtree, B. F. (2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: Controversies and recommendations. Annals of Family Medicine, 6, 331–339.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Davies, M. (2013). Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 529–544. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.697878.
Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (2015). Introduction. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 1–25). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment & instruction: The Delphi report. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press. https://bit. ly/2IZi8FY.
Facione, P. A., Sánchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1–25.
Fairclough, N. (1999). Global capitalism and critical awareness of language. Language Awareness, 8(2), 71–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658419908667119.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research(4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Foss, D. H., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of pedagogical and mathematical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 429–442.
Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 69-74.
Heigham, J., & Croker, R. A. (2009). Qualitative research in Applied Linguistics. New York: Palgrave Macimilian.
Helsdingen, A., van Gog, T., & van Merri¨enboer, J. (2011). The effects of practice schedule and critical thinking prompts on learning and transfer of a complex judgment task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 383–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022370.
Kabilan, M. K., Adlina, W. F. W., & Embi, M. A. (2011). Online collaboration of English language teachers for meaningful professional development experiences. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(4), 94–115.
Koenig, J., Herman, J., Duncan, G., Knapp, D., Kyllnonen, P., Sackett, P., . . . Iverson, K. (2011). Assessing 21st century skills: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson’s Research Reports, 6, 40–41.
Liang, W., & Fung, D. (2021). Fostering critical thinking in English as a second lanauge classrooms: Challenges and opportunitie. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39(1), 11-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100769
Lee, P., & Thanthong, S. (2017). Teaching critical in accounting classes: Asian higher Education context. Catalyst, 16(1), 53-64.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Luk, J., & Lin, A. (2015). Voices without words: Doing critical literate talk in English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 67–91.
Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 1212–1222. doi:10.1177/1049732315588501
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spires, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-21.
Packer, M. J. (2011). The science of qualitative research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pascarella, E. T. (1989). The development of critical thinking: Does college make a difference? Journal of College Student Development, 30, 19–26.
Rafi, M. S. (2009). Promoting critical pedagogy in language education. International Research Journal of Arts & Humanities, 37, 63-73.
Santos Meneses, L. F. (2020). Critical thinking perspectives across contexts and curricula: Dominant, neglected, and complementing dimensions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100610.
Scriven, M. and Paul, R. (1987). Defining critical thinking. The critical thinking community: Foundation for critical thinking. Retrieved from: www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/define_critical_ thinking. cfm
Shirkhani, S., & Fahim, M. (2011). Enhancing critical thinking in foreign language learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 111–115.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research.New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Thomas, K., & Lok, B. (2015). Teaching critical thinking: An operational framework. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 93–104). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vermunt, J. D., & Endedijk, M. D. (2011). Patterns in teacher learning in different phases of the professional career. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.019
Wood, M., & Rosser, K. (2011). Basic steps in planning nursing research: From question to proposal. New York: Barllett Learning.
Yin, K. (2011) Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.
Zhang, H. (2019). Understanding English language major teachers’ cognition on language and critical thinking integrated teaching. Foreign Languages Research, 176(4), 57–62.
Zhang, H., Yuan, R. & He, X. (2020) Investigating University EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Critical Thinking and Its Teaching: Voices from China. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 29, 483–493 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00500-6.
Zhao, C., Pandian, A., & Singh, M. K. M. (2016). Instructional strategies for developing critical thinking in EFL classrooms. English Language Teaching, 9(10), 14-21. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 990 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 444 |
||