آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 5 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 108 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,228 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,146,412 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,004,954 |
Exploring EFL Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Teacher Supervision in Iranian Language Schools | ||
| Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 9، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 9، دی 2021، صفحه 105-125 اصل مقاله (1.43 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2021.27221.1300 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Shiva Azizpour1؛ Javad Gholami* 2 | ||
| 1PhD in TEFL, ELT Lecturer, Department of English Language, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of English Language, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Although supervision is an integral component of EFL teacher professional development, there have not been enough studies on language teacher supervision and EFL teachers’ attitudes toward supervision. The present study investigated EFL teachers’ attitudes toward supervision in Iranian language schools. To this end, 218 EFL teachers who received supervision were selected and asked to complete a teacher supervision questionnaire (Moradi, Sepehrifar, & Khadiv, 2014) to elicit their attitudes, feelings, and experiences toward supervision. The questionnaire consisted of five subcategories: teachers’ evaluation of supervision, their attitudes toward the mode of supervision, the contributions of teacher-supervision to their development, and the process before, during, and after supervision. The findings revealed that a great number of the participants harbored this view that the current supervision is useful for them and necessary for novice teachers. However, some held negative attitudes toward supervision as it puts them under pressure, creates anxiety, and damages their confidence and motivation. They found their supervisors’ feedback unsatisfactory mainly done for paperwork formalities. To improve the ongoing supervisory practices, they suggested the need for the development of transparent criteria and rubrics for supervision and called for discontinuation of unannounced and sudden supervisory observations. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| EFL teachers؛ language schools؛ language school supervisors؛ supervision؛ language teacher supervision | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D. (1997). Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers: Pre-service and in-service applications. New York: Longman.
Amini, S., & Gholami, J. (2018). Professional development of EFL teachers through rotatory peer supervision. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(2), 101-117.
Azizpour, S., & Gholami, J. (2021a). Iranian languageschool managers’ attitudes towards EFL teacher supervision. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 9(35), 53-69.
Azizpour, S., & Gholami, J. (2021b). EFL teacher-supervisors’ attitudes toward supervision in Iranian language schools. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(1), 16-34.
Bailey, K. M. (2006). Language teacher supervision: A case-based approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Blumberg, A. (1980). Supervisors and teachers: A private cold war (2nd ed.). Berkeley: Mc Cutchan Publishing.
Bolin, F. S., & Panaritis, P. (1992). Searching for a common purpose: A perspective on history of supervision. In C. D. Glickman (Ed.). Supervision in transition (pp. 30-43). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Brandon, J., Hollweck, T., Donlevy, J. K., & Whalen, C. (2018). Teacher supervision and evaluation challenges: Canadian perspectives on overall instructional leadership. Teachers and teaching, 24(3), 263-280.
Burns, R. W., Jacobs, J., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2020). A framework for naming the scope and nature of teacher candidate supervision in clinically-based teacher preparation: Tasks, high-leverage practices, and pedagogical routines of practice. The Teacher Educator, 55(2), 214-238.
Chamberlin, C. R. (2000). Nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of trustworthiness in teacher‐supervisor relationships. Communication Education, 49(4), 352-364.
Chen, C. W. Y., & Cheng, Y. S. (2013). The supervisory process of EFL teachers: A case study. TESL-EJ, 17(1), 1-21.
Dangel, J. R., & Tanguay, C. (2014). “Don't leave us out there alone”: A framework for supporting supervisors. Action in Teacher Education, 36(1), 3-19.
Daresh, J. C. (2001). Supervision as proactive leadership. Illinois: Waveland PressInc.
Diacopoulos, M. M., & Butler, B. M. (2020). What do we supervise for? A self-study of learning teacher candidate supervision. Studying Teacher Education, 16(1), 66-83.
Duke, D. L. (1987). School leadership and instructional improvement. New York: Random House.
Freeman, D. (1982). Observing teachers: Three approaches to in‐service training and development. Tesol Quarterly, 16(1), 21-28.
Freeman, D. (1989). Teacher training, development, and decision making: A model of teaching and related strategies for language teacher education. TESOL quarterly, 23(1), 27-45.
Garver, R., & Maloney, T. (2020). Redefining supervision: A joint inquiry into preparing school-based leaders to supervise for equity. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 15(4), 330-355.
Gholaminejad, R. (2020). When the evil pops in: exploring the unheard voices of teachers working in private language schools in Iran concerning supervisory observation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-24. doi:10.1080/13603124.2020.1740795.
Glanz, J. (1995). Exploring supervision history: An invitation and agenda. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10(2), 95-113.
Glanz, J. (2000). Supervision for the millennium: A retrospective and prospective. Focus on Education, 44(1), 9-16.
Gordon, S. P. (1990). Developmental supervision: An exploratory study of a promising model. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(4), 293-307.
Hazi, H. M. (1994). The teacher evaluation-supervision dilemma: A case of entanglements and irreconcilable differences. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9(2), 195–216.
Higgins, M., Morton, A. E., & Wolkenhauer, R. (2018). (Re)conceptualizing preservice teacher supervision through duoethnography: Reflecting, supporting, and collaborating with and for each other. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69(1), 75-84.
Hill, T., & Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT analysis: It's time for a product recall. Long range planning, 30(1), 46-52.
Hoque, K. E., Bt Kenayathulla, H. B., Subramaniam, M. V., & Islam, R. (2020). Relationships between supervision and teachers’ performance and attitude in secondary schools in Malaysia. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1-11.
Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225-259.
Janssens, F. J., & Van Amelsvoort, G. H. (2008). School self-evaluations and school inspections in Europe: An exploratory study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(1), 15-23.
Johnson, D. A., Ivers, N. N., Avera, J. A., & Frazee, M. (2020). Supervision guidelines for fostering state-mindfulness among supervisees. The Clinical Supervisor, 39(1), 128-145.
Kapusuzoglu, S., & Dilekci, U. (2017). Development of the artistic supervision model scale (ASMS). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 1192-1200.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public opinion quarterly, 24(2), 163-204.
Kayaoglu, M. N. (2012). Dictating or facilitating: The supervisory process for language teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(10), 103-117.
Kutsyuruba, V. (2003). Instructional supervision: Perceptions of Canadian and Ukrainian beginning high-school teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saskatchewan University.
Lam, S. F. (2001). Educators’ opinions on classroom observation as a practice of staff development and appraisal. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 161-173.
Mette, I., Aguilar, I., & Wieczorek, D. (2020). A thirty state analysis of teacher supervision and evaluation systems in the ESSA era. Journal of Educational Supervision, 3(2), 105-135.
Moradi, K., Sepehrifar, S., & Khadiv, T. P. (2014). Exploring Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions on supervision. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(1), 1214-1223.
Phillips, A., & Rogers, M. (2020). Examining the tensions between rapport with pre-service teachers and authority in becoming a teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, 16(3), 1-21.
Roberson, S., & Roberson, R. (2009). The role and practice of the principal in developing novice first-year teachers. The Clearing House, 82(3), 113-118.
Rokeach, M. (1971). Long-range experimental modification of values, attitudes, and behavior. American psychologist, 26(5), 453-459.
Salih, A. R. A. (2013). Peer evaluation of teaching or "fear" evaluation: In search of compatibility. Higher Education Studies, 3(2), 102-114.
Siddiek, A. G. (2012). The effective role of language supervisor in the enhancement of foreign language education in developing countries. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(1), 39.
Sullivan, S. & Glanz, J. (2000). Supervision that improves teaching: Strategies and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Tesfaw, T. A., & Hofman, R. H. (2014). Relationship between instructional supervision and professional development. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 13(1), 82-99.
Watkins, P. (2005). The principal’s role in attracting, retaining, and developing new teachers: Three strategies for collaboration and support. The Clearing House, 79(2), 83-87.
Wiles, K., & Lovell, J. (1975). Supervision for better schools. USA: Prentice Hall.
Zepeda, S. J. (2012). Instructional supervision. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
Zepeda, S. J. (2017). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 651 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 544 |
||