آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 5 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 111 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,247 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,199,563 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,060,275 |
The Relationship Between Iranian EFL Learners’ International Posture and Willingness to Communicate Across High Versus Low English Proficiency Levels | ||
| Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 9، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 18، دی 2021، صفحه 151-170 اصل مقاله (632.21 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2021.27167.1278 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Nadia Mahmoodi1؛ Nasser Ghafoori* 2؛ Seyed Reza Beh-Afarin* 3 | ||
| 1PhD Candidate in English Language Teaching, Sarab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sarab, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, English Department, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, ELT Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The study attempted to investigate the relationship between male Iranian EFL learners’ international posture (IP) and willingness to communicate (WTC) across two proficiency levels. The study was carried out with 106 participants from selected universities in Tabriz and Sarab, Northwest Iran, who were divided into two groups of high and low proficiency based on a Preliminary English Test (PET). The data were collected by the administration of WTC Scale (McCroskey & Richmond, 1990) and IP questionnaire (Yashima, 2000). The collected data were analyzed through Pearson correlation and independent samples t-test. The results showed that there was positive correlation between WTC and IP in the high-proficiency group while the correlation in the low proficiency-group was not statistically significant. It was also found that high proficiency learners had higher levels of both IP and WTC compared to their lower level counterparts. The findings of the study offer pedagogical implications for EFL learners, teachers, and syllabus designers. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| international posture؛ Iranian EFL learners’ proficiency level؛ willingness to communicate | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Afghari, A., & Sadeghi, E. (2012). The effect of EFL learners' gender and second language proficiency on willingness to communicate. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies, 1(1), 49-66. DOI: 10. 22034/efl. 2012. 79161
Alemi, M., Daftarifard, P., & Pashmforoosh, R. (2011). The Impact of language anxiety and language proficiency on WTC in EFL. Cross-Cultural Communication, 7(3), 150-166. DOI. 10. 3968/j. ccc. 1923670020110703. 152
Altıner, C. (2018). Turkish EFL learners' willingness to communicate in English. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 5(1), 40-49.
Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50(2), 311-341. DOI. ORG/10. 1111/0023-8333. 00119
Biria, R., & Jouybari, B. (2016). The relationship among willingness to communicate, language proficiency, and oral fluency of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 8(1), 51-56.
Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness-to-communicate scale: Development and validation. Communication Monographs, 43, 60-69.
Chang, C. M. (2018). Exploring factors influencing the willingness to communicate among English-as-a-second language university students(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of San Francisco, USF Scholarship: A digital repository. Available at: https://repository.usfca.edu/diss/451
Cetinkaya, Y. B. (2005). Turkish college students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr Chu, H. R. (2008). Shyness and EFL learning in Taiwan: A study of shy and non-shy college students’ use of strategies, foreign language anxiety, motivation, and willingness to communicate (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin.
Creswell, J. W. (2011). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th Ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Dehbozorgi, E. (2012). Effects of attitude towards language learning and risk-taking on EFL student's proficiency. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(2), 41-48.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd Ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Jahin J. H., & Idrees, M. W. (2012). EFL major student teachers’ writing proficiency and attitudes towards learning English. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Educational & Psychologic Sciences, 4(1), 10-72.
Jamaleddin, Z. (2015). Comparison between male and female in their willingness to communicate and use of socio-affective strategies. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(4), 70-81. Available online @ www.ijeionline.com
Karimi, M. N., & Abbaszadeh, A. (2017). Autonomy-supportive teaching, willingness to communicate in English, motivation, and English-speaking self-efficacy among EFL learners: A structural equation modeling study. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 20(2), 113-156.
Khatib, M., & Nourzadeh, S. (2015). Development and validation of an instructional willingness to communicate questionnaire. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(3), 266-283.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11, 135-142. Doi.org/10. 1080/08824099409359951
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3-26.
MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388. Doi.org/10. 1017/S0272263101003035
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning Journal, 52(3), 537–564. Doi. org/10. 1111/1467-9922. 00194
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40, 16-25.
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association, convention 1985 Denver, co.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 72-77.
Miller, L. (2017). The relationship between language proficiency and language attitudes: Evidence from young Spanish-English bilinguals. Spanish in Context, 14(1), 99–123. Doi10. 1075/sic. 14. 1. 05mil
Öz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Willingness to communicate of EFL learners in Turkish context. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 269-275.
Rostami, G., Kashanian, V., & Gholami, H. (2016). The relationship between language proficiency and willingness to communicate in English in an Iranian EFL context. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(2), 166-176. Available at www. jallr. com
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Heinkel (Ed.) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tan, K. E., & Phairot, S. R. (2018). Willingness to communicate among Thai EFL students: Does English proficiency matter? The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(3), 590-602. doi.org/10.8823/ASIATEFL. 2018. 15. 3. 2.
Valadi, A., Rezaee, A. & Kogani, P. (2015). The relationship between language learners’ willingness to communicate and their oral language proficiency with regard to gender differences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(5), 147-160.
Wen, W. P., & Clément, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18-38.
Xie, Q. M. (2011). Willingness to communicate in English among secondary school students in the rural Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom (Doctoral dissertation), Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://openrepository. aut. ac. nz/bitstream/handle/10292/2548/xieq. pdf?sequence=3 Yashima, T. (2000). Orientations and motivation in foreign language learning: A study of Japanese college students. JACET Bulletin, 31, 121–133.
Zakian, M. (2019). Willingness to communicate among less intelligent and more intelligent learners: A case of Iranian EFL learners across gender. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies,7(4). 125-131.
Zarei, N., Saeidi, M., & Ahangari, S. (2019). Exploring EFL teachers’ socio-affective and pedagogic strategies and students’ willingness to communicate with a focus on Iranian culture. Education Research International, 1, 1-11. doi.org/10.1155/2019/3464163 Zeinivand, T., Azizifar, A., & Gowhary, H. (2015). The relationship between attitude and speaking proficiency of Iranian EFL learners: The case of Darrehshehr city (Conference Presentation).An international conference on teaching and learning English as an additional language, Antalya, Turkey. Available online at www. sciencedirect. com
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 471 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 563 |
||