آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 5 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 116 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,328 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,329,424 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,252,922 |
The Impact of Multimodal Feedback on Writing Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency of Iranian EFL Learners in Flipped and Traditional Classrooms | ||
| Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 13، شماره 1، تیر 2025 | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22049/jalda.2025.30042.1731 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Maryam Farnia* 1؛ Fatemeh Hemmati2؛ Raziyeh Rabbani Yekta3؛ Shoora Mirsayafi4 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor of TEFL, Department of English Language and Literature, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor of TEFL, Department of English Language and Literature, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4PhD Candidate in English Language Teaching, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This quasi-experimental research examined multimodal feedback impacts on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) of Iranian EFL learners in flipped and traditional classrooms. Hence, 57 Iranian EFL learners from two different language institutes at Babol City were recruited and divided into four groups, including two experimental groups of flipped classroom plus multimodal feedback and traditional classroom plus multimodal feedback and two control groups of a flipped classroom plus monomodal (text-written) feedback and traditional classroom plus monomodal (text-written) feedback. Pretest and posttest were used to elicit information on the learners’ writing CAF. Experimental groups received multimodal feedback, and control groups received monomodal feedback during 12 weeks (24 sessions). According to the results obtained from one-way analysis of multivariate (MANOVA), providing multimodal feedback significantly improved students’ writing performance. Furthermore, using multimodal feedback via a flipped teaching model significantly influenced EFL learners’ writing CAF, suggesting that foreign language educators could effectively employ multimodal feedback primarily via flipped instruction to improve writing performance in intermediate EFL learners. The study results were discussed and some suggestions were given. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| traditional classroom؛ flipped classroom؛ multimodal feedback؛ writing CAF | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher education research & development, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Afshinfar, J., & Shokouhifar, A. (2016). The effect of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on the narrative writing of advanced EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 4(2), 15–41. https://doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2018.26273.1075
Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The chronicle of higher education, 12(19), 1-3.
Boyraz, S., & Ocak, G. (2017). Implementation of flipped education into Turkish EFL teaching context. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 426-439.
Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching: The Roles of Fluency and Accuracy. Cambridge University Press.
Camiciottoli, B. C., & Campoy-Cubillo, M. C. (2018). Introduction: The nexus of multimodality, multimodal literacy, and English language teaching in research and practice in higher education settings. System, 77, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.005
Cavaleri, M., Kawaguchi, S., Di Biase, B., & Power, C. (2019). How recorded audio-visual feedback can improve academic language support. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.16.4.6
Chang, C., Cunningham, K. J., Satar, H. M., & Strobl, C. (2017). Electronic feedback on second language writing: A retrospective and prospective essay on multimodality. Writing & Pedagogy, 9(3). https://doi.org.er.lib.ncku.edu.tw/10.1558
Coffman, M. L. (2011). The Impacts of Web-Enhanced Versus Traditional Writing Instruction. Union University. https://search.proquest.com/openview/fe3f80f0
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474-509. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing Learner Language. Oxford University Press.
Engman, M. M. (2021). A worksheet, a whiteboard, a teacher-learner: Leveraging materials and colonial language frames for multimodal Indigenous language learning. Classroom Discourse, 12(1-2), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.1856696
Faradhibah, R. N., & Nur, N. A. (2017). Analyzing students' difficulties in maintaining their coherence and cohesion in writing process. English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal, 3(2), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V32.2017.A7
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Examining the impact of flipped classroom on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A case of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1668-1706. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1825097
Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students' digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL quarterly, 48(4), 655-685. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.138
Hao, Y. (2016). Middle school students' flipped learning readiness in foreign language classrooms: Exploring its relationship with personal characteristics and individual circumstances. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.031
Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press.
Jacko, J., Emery, V. K., Edwards, P. J., Ashok, M., Barnard, L., Kongnakorn, T., Moloney, K. P., & Sainfort, F. (2004). The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(4), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290310001659213
Jony, M. S. (2016). Student centered instruction for interactive and effective teaching learning: Perceptions of teachers in Bangladesh. Online Submission, 3(3), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5669776
Kashefian-Naeeini, S., & Sheikhnezami-Naeini, Z. (2020). Communication skills among school masters of different gender in Shiraz, Iran. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(2), 1607-1611. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/3405/2350
Lee, G., & Wallace, A. (2018). Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: Outcomes and perceptions. TESOL quarterly, 52(1), 62-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.372
Mardian, F., & Nafissi, Z. (2022). Synchronous computer-mediated corrective feedback and EFL learners' grammatical knowledge development: A sociocultural perspective. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 115-136.
Marlowe, J. P., & Asaba, M. (2022). A CAF perspective on L2 development through writing practice: An exploratory study. Reflections and new perspectives. JALT., 2021(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.37546/jaltpcp2021-15
Martin, D. (2020). Providing students with multimodal feedback experiences. Journal of Curriculum, Teaching, Learning and Leadership in Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.32873/uno.dc.ctlle.05.01.1082
Mayer, R. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816819
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
Mousavi, H. S., & Kashefian-Naeeini, S. (2011). Academic writing problems of Iranian post-graduate students at national university of Malaysia (UKM). European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(4), 593-603.
Noordin, N., & Khojasteh, L. (2021). The effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(4), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n4p124
Nourinezhad, S., Hadipourfard, E., & Bavali, M. (2021). The effect of audio-visual feedback on writing components and writing performance of medical university students in two different modes of instruction, flipped and traditional. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1978621. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1978621
Perkoski, R. R. (2017). The impact of multimedia feedback on student perceptions: Video screencast with audio compared to text-based email [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh].
Paivio, A. (1979). Imagery and Verbal Processes (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315798868
Satar, H. M., & Wigham, C. R. (2017). Multimodal instruction-giving practices in webconferencing-supported language teaching. System, 70, 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.002
Sherafati, N., Largani, F. M., & Amini, S. (2020). Exploring the effect of computer-mediated teacher feedback on the writing achievement of Iranian EFL learners: Does motivation count? Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4591-4613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10177-5
Sadeghi, K., Abolfazli Khonbi, Z., & Gheytaranzadeh, F. (2013). The effect of type of corrective feedback (direct vs. indirect) on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners' writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 1(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2013.13527
Skehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in second language acquisition, 13(2), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100009979
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 510-532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
Tajallizadeh Khob, M., & Rabi, A. (2014). Meaning-focused audiovisual feedback and EFL writing motivation. Journal of Language and Translation, 4(2), 61-70. http://journals.iau.ir/article_515892_d31ebd54f4d8fbe42db61abb08d0f576.pdf
Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
Wen, X., & Walters, S. M. (2022). The impact of technology on students’ writing performances in elementary classrooms: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100082
Wilson, S. G. (2013). The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313487461
Zemach, D. E., & Rumisek, L. A. (2003). Academic Writing from Paragraph to Essay. Oxford University Press.
Zhang, Y. (2018). Analysis of using multimodal feedback in writing instruction from EFL learners’ perspective. English Language and Literature Studies, 8(4), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.5539/ELLS.V8N4P21
Ziegler, N. (2016). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in second language acquisition, 38(3), 553-586. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500025X | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 230 |
||